The recently released Advancing Timeliness in Ohio Courts report highlights the factors affecting caseflow management and timeliness in Ohio’s judicial system. The findings, based on surveys of attorneys and judiciary members, highlight the challenges courts face in ensuring efficient case processing while maintaining fairness and justice.

To address these challenges, the Advancing Timeliness in Ohio Courts report puts forth several key recommendations aimed at improving court operations and efficiency. These proposals include:

• Promoting Scheduling Orders: The report suggests encouraging courts to use scheduling orders with clear deadlines. Consistently enforcing these deadlines can reduce unnecessary continuances and promote earlier case resolution. 25% of attorneys cited the courts not maintaining firm trial dates as a major source of delay.
• Resolving Discovery Disputes: The report encourages courts to adopt stronger practices to enforce discovery cut-off dates and promote early case planning. This approach helps narrow the scope of legal disputes, reduces unnecessary delays, and ensures that cases progress efficiently.
• Timely Decision-Making: To enhance timely decision-making, the report recommends creating bench cards and posters to set clear expectations for parties and attorneys regarding case processing timelines, judicial officers allocating dedicated time in their calendars for decision writing, and courts adopting standardized templates for ruling on motions.
• Addressing Transcript Delays: The report identifies delays in the production of case transcripts as a significant impediment in both trial and appellate courts. It recommends local collaboration and the use of technology to improve transcript timeliness.
• Expanding Mediation and Settlement Programs: The report recommends promoting Settlement Week and other dispute resolution services as effective tools for reducing court backlogs in civil and domestic relations cases.

The report also highlights systemic issues that contribute to delays, including:

• Service-Related Delays: Attorneys reported delays in certified mail service (33%) and ongoing issues with U.S. Postal Service confirmation practices (32%).
• Failure of parties to appear for court: 28% of judiciary survey respondents indicated that the failure of parties to appear for court is a significant contributing factor to delayed case processing.
• Attorney Scheduling Conflicts: Nearly half (48%) of judiciary respondents cited attorney scheduling conflicts as a major source of delay.
• Increasing case complexity: 28% of attorneys practicing in the trial courts, and 40% of attorneys practicing in the courts of appeals cited increasing case complexity as a major source of delay.

The Advancing Timeliness in Ohio Courts report recommendations include improving caseflow management practices, increasing judicial and attorney resources, and addressing systemic inefficiencies such as service delays and overcrowded calendars.