The Ohio Board of Professional Conduct has filed six reports with the Supreme Court of Ohio.

Two reports recommend that the Supreme Court impose disciplinary sanctions against Ohio attorneys based upon the submission of consent-to-discipline agreements.

Parties who have not consented to discipline have an opportunity to file objections to the Board’s reports and recommendations with the Supreme Court. If a party files objections, the Supreme Court will schedule the case for oral argument.

Additional information about each case, including the report and recommendation, may be obtained by clicking on the Court case number.

Clark County
Disciplinary Counsel v. Kristina Jo Sims
Supreme Court Case No. 2026-1067
Recommended sanction: One-year suspension, stayed

Cuyahoga County
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mark Andrew Snider
Supreme Court Case No. 2026-1068
Recommended sanction: Two-year suspension, stayed

Franklin County
Disciplinary Counsel v. Jeffrey Lee Amick
Supreme Court Case No. 2026-1059
Recommended sanction: Public reprimand (consent to discipline)

Mahoning County
Disciplinary Counsel v. Wesley Alton Johnston
Supreme Court Case No. 2026-1064
Recommended sanction: Two-year suspension, stayed

Montgomery County
Disciplinary Counsel v. Hui Li
Supreme Court Case No. 2026-1074
Recommended sanction: Permanent disbarment

Summit County
Disciplinary Counsel v. Charles Tyler Sr.
Supreme Court Case No. 2026-1062
Recommended sanction: One-year suspension, six months stayed (consent to discipline)